Ultra-short-throw (UST) projectors are often marketed as TV replacements because they can deliver a massive image from a very short distance and have a footprint smaller than any TV. It’s hard not to be intrigued by the idea of swapping out a burdensome big-screen TV for a small box and still getting a 100-inch image. But the truth is, these are still projectors, and expensive ones at that. After testing four UST projectors at varying prices and performance levels, we’ve concluded that the vast majority of people are better off getting either a large TV or a traditional projector. You’ll either get better performance or spend less—oftentimes both.
Dismiss
from Wirecutter: Reviews for the Real World https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/blog/ultra-short-throw-projector-vs-tv/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=RSS%20Feed
No comments:
Post a Comment